Welcome back to the Planet of the
Apes retrospective! In this
entry we're going to cover the latest film in the franchise, Rise
of the Planet of the Apes! After
the major misfire that was the Planet of the Apes
remake, faith in the franchise was at an all-time low. Despite making
a healthy profit off of the remake, Fox did the right thing and let
the series take a bit of a break. However, ten years after the Apes
remake destroyed our faith in Tim Burton, the franchise was rebooted
with Rise of the Planet of the Apes.
Could this entry restore faith in the franchise, or were the Apes
doomed to extinction? Read on to find out...
After
Planet of the Apes
became a go-to example of one of the worst remakes of all time, it
seemed like the franchise was pretty much dead in the water. In spite
of this public perception, around 2006 husband and wife screenwriters
Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver (what's with these ape films and
husband-wife screenwriting duos?) became interested in stories about
pet chimpanzees. I can't find a confirmation of this, but it's very
likely that one of these stories was that of
Nim Chimpsky, an ape whose story is somewhat similar to that of
Caesar in the final film. Whatever the case, Jaffa and Silver
realized that the story they were formulating would fit into the Apes
franchise quite well, and so wrote a script which they sold to Fox.
While not officially a remake, the film plays out like a remake of
Conquest of the Planet of the Apes
on a very superficial level (in that it's about the fall of humanity,
brought about by an ape called Caesar who leads an ape uprising).
That said, its themes of genetic engineering and human-ape
interaction largely replace the revolutionary overtones and vengeance
prevalent in Conquest.
Early in development, the film was simply titled “Caesar”,
which was the first I heard of the project. Considering that Conquest
was my second favourite Apes
movie, I was excited to see what they could do with the premise given
a respectful budget to make it. However, the film seemed to have a
bit of development trouble because Caesar
was officially cancelled at one point before the project reemerged as
Rise of the Apes
(which was changed to the mouthful that is Rise of the
Planet of the Apes because the
studio was afraid people wouldn't realize that it was an Apes
movie otherwise).
Attached
to direct was Rupert Wyatt whose only other directing credit was The
Escapist in 2008, which had
fairly positive reviews. For the visual effects, the producers
decided that the apes were going to have to look like actual apes
instead of the anthropomorphic ones which had populated the previous
films. To accommodate this need, Weta Digital (the effects company
behind The Lord of the Rings
and the appropriately ape-centric King Kong
remake) was brought in to do performance capture for the apes. Andy
Serkis was also brought in to play Caesar, due to his unparalleled
experience, mastery of motion capture and experience with playing an
ape (again, King Kong).
James Franco was also cast as Caesar's owner, Will. When I heard all
of this stuff for the first time, I was giddy with excitement: “A
new apes movie with Andy Serkis, Weta Digital and Jame Franco? Holy
crap it sounds like they're actually trying this time!”
Unfortunately,
as the release drew closer and closer, my optimism began to diminish.
It started with the first trailer which, as
this blogger sums up quite well, was not very good. The early
marketing for the film just wasn't very good, focusing more on the
action than the emotional core, and making it look like we were in
for a disappointment. Then there was the title change and some
mediocre posters which just further until I found myself approaching
the film very cautiously leading up to release...
Rise
follows a scientist named Will who is developing a serum to cure
Alzheimers. After a lab accident in which Will's reputation is
shattered, he discovers that the child of a lab ape has had the serum
passed on to him, which makes him incredibly intelligent. Will ends
up raising the ape, dubbed Caesar, as if he were a human. However, as
Caesar grows he finds that he doesn't fit in with the humans and is
eventually taken to a corrupt primate shelter. It is here that
Caesar realizes that he has to do something to liberate the apes,
sparking a revolution...
As you
can probably see, Rise
isn't nearly as simplistic as many of the previous Apes
films. It has a smart script with plenty of twists and turns, and one
which is extremely relevant to modern audiences, much like the
paranoia of nuclear annihilation would have resonated with fans of
the original 1968 Apes.
There's also many genuinely affecting moments, such as when we
discover that Will's drive to cure Alzheimers stems from the fact
that his father is succumbing to the disease. It's pretty
heartbreaking and turns Rise
into something far beyond the stereotypical mad scientist trope. The
“NO” scene is also incredible, and is easily going to go down as
one of the most iconic sequences in the entire franchise. Simply put,
Jaffa and Silver put together a fantastic script, and it really
shows.
That
said, there are some weak points in the story. Plenty of the
characters are given very little depth or characterization. The
douche bag neighbour and Will's boss, Jacobs, are both completely
one-dimensional (the neighbour's always bitching at people and Jacobs
is completely obsessed with making money). In both cases it works,
but it's unfortunate that they couldn't have given them a bit more
substance. They're far from the only characters who suffer though –
the staff of the ape shelter are all given nothing to work with,
despite featuring Brian Cox and Tom Felton in their ranks. Probably
the biggest disappointment in terms of character depth though would
have to be Freida Pinto as the veterinarian, Caroline Aranha. Again,
she isn't given much material, being little more than a conscience
and generic love interest (funny how we still can't get past that
trope 45 year later).
While
many of the human characters are weak, the apes are far more
interesting (this is probably intentional too, since the apes are the
“heroes” of the story). Being the first apes movie with
completely CGI apes, one could be forgiven for worrying that the
effects may not be sufficient, but the special effects really are
great. I'm worried that they might look kind of dated in 15 years,
but if nothing else the facial expressions are spot-on. This is
really a testament to the amazing mo-cap work of Weta and the actors,
since the apes rely on facial expressions and gestures to convey
their emotions (Wyatt “cheats” only on a couple occasions with
subtitling, but generally he lets the audience figure things out for
themselves). Caesar is brought to life fantastically by Andy Serkis,
who I was hoping would win Best Supporting Actor in 2011 (he didn't,
sadly). We follow Caesar from his childhood innocence and see him
grow into a capable leader, but we're never really sure if he is
going to go over the homicidal edge or not. The other apes are given
recognizable characters as well, and it's impressive that we actually
find ourselves caring for and cheering them on as the film
progresses. Maurice is Caesar's orangutan advisor, Rocket's the
former alpha male at the sanctuary who becomes one of Caesar's most
reliable followers and Buck is Caesar's gorilla enforcer (it's truly
tragic when he gets gunned down). There's also Koba, the long-time
lab test subject who clearly has psychotic tendencies and wants to
get revenge on the humans.
I've also got to give a shout-out to
Rupert Wyatt who directs the film with real expertise. As I mentioned
earlier, Wyatt elects to show, rather than tell, more often than not.
This makes many of the film's details into real heartbreaking
moments, such as when we discover that Will's father has Alzheimers
(and when it returns as well). He also is very adept with action
sequences, as the entire ape “revolution” is very exciting and
funner than... well, a barrel of monkeys. He also manages to make an
end credits sequence totally epic... how many movies can boast that!?
Of course, Patrick Doyle's score helps significantly as well, I
really can't stress enough how great it is.
That said, there is one aspect of Rise
which bugs me more than any other, and that's the sheer number of
immersion-breaking references to the original film. Sure, a few
call-backs are fun for fans of the franchise, but when it feels like
entire plot points are only present to serve as a reference it gets a
bit grating. For example, here's a list of references I compiled
while watching: the film opens with a hunt reminiscent to the famous
human hunt, the intelligent apes are called “bright eyes” because
their eyes have green flecks in them, Caesar is seen building a
Statue of Liberty puzzle, Dodge yells “It's a madhouse!”, the
“damn dirty ape” line and sprays Caesar with a hose and one of
the characters watches a Charlton Heston movie. If that wasn't
enough, the names of many of the characters are also references: the
orangutan Maurice is named after Maurice Evans (who played Dr.
Zaius), Dodge Landon is named after the other two astronauts who
arrived with Colonel Taylor and Caesar's (likely) future love
interest is named Cornelia. At that point it's just excessive and
distracting, especially for someone like me who knows the original
film inside and out. That said, it's a relatively minor complaint
overall.
It should be pretty clear that I love Rise of the
Planet of the Apes. It's
fantastic, I love it more every time I see it. It's easily the best
Apes movie since the
original and hopefully bodes well for the franchise's future. If you
haven't seen it yet then I heartily recommend that you do so
immediately!
8.5/10
So how
is the future of the Apes
franchise looking? Well there's a new film in the pipeline for a 2014
release called Dawn of the Planet of the Apes.
Much like Rise is a
loose remake of Conquest,
Dawn looks like it
will be a remake of Battle.
Clearly there's going to be conflict between Caesar and Koba, with
Koba being a stand-in for General Aldo. Considering how clearly
unhinged Koba was in his limited screen time in Rise,
Dawn should feature
some brutal showdowns between the warring factions. As bad as Battle
was, this was largely due to its
budget – with the proper budget that Dawn's
getting, I'm totally stoked that it will be another awesome film. In
fact, Dawn is up there
with The Hobbit films
as my most anticipated films. Sadly Rupert Wyatt isn't back, but he's
been replaced with Matt Reeves (Cloverfield,
Let Me In), which I
have to admit might just be an improvement. With Weta and Andy Serkis
back, plus a new cast featuring such famous actors as Gary Oldman (!)
and Kerri Russell, it should be an amazing time. Plus Rise
has left plenty of room for sequels – I almost wonder if Brian Cox
was left with little to work with in order to bring him back in a
sequel as a General Kolp analogue... not likely, but possible.
Whatever the case, I'm happy that one of my favourite franchises is
still going strong and looks to do so well into the future.
This is how I would rank the series
from best to worst:
1. Planet of the Apes (1968)
2. Rise of the Planet of the Apes
3.
Escape from the Planet of the Apes
(it's a better film than Conquest,
but they're both about neck-and-neck for me)
4.
Conquest of the Planet of the Apes
5.
Beneath the Planet of the Apes
6.
Battle for the Planet of the Apes
(this and the remake are pretty much equally bad, it's hard to
objectively decide which I dislike more...)
7.
Planet of the Apes
(2001)
Thanks for getting through this retrospective series and as always feel free to comment and give suggestions for future franchises for me to review!
Loved the retrospective! I've only seen two of these movies but you really do all of them justice I would say! Good work again Barloq!
ReplyDelete